Cheap-ass that I am, I'm all for cost-efficiency. But back-to-back marathons (or back-to-back-to-back; is that was the Triple Challenge is?) might not be very cost effective, when you factor in the doctor bills afterwards...<br><br>
Really? Well yeah, then I can win from NJ. Of course, with my luck, some faster person will make the trek across the country for it this year...<br><br>
Heh. This really hasn't been a goal of mine. (Being first from NJ, I mean). It'd be a cute accomplishment if it happens. But I don't think I'm going to choose a race based solely on how many people from NJ typically run it... <img alt="biggrin.gif" src="http://files.kickrunners.com/smilies/biggrin.gif"><br><br>
My PR is also on a course far away from home (about 1000 miles) in a place I'd never been before. And on a hard course. So I would say it doesn't matter if you know what the building around the corner looked like. But I <b>would</b> say it's extremely advantageous to know the hill profile. The Mercedes Marthon was <b>very</b> hilly, but I knew that (and I knew where they were), so I was prepared for each hill.<br><br><b>Prae</b>, I would say you don't need to know what the course <b>looks</b> like, per se. But you should definitely know the hill profile, plus a few more things. You should know what the weather will be. See Chicago '07. Check the advance forecast 10 days out, and then check it again every day for updates. And prepare yourself accordingly. (As best as possible. As Chicago showed, sometimes even that's not enough).<br><br>
You should also do enough research to find out a few other things to prevent surprises. Will the course be really crowded, or will there be stretches where you're practically alone? Will there be noisy spectators everywhere, or will there be gaps where there's nobody? Where are the fluid stations? Is it asphalt the whole way, or does the surface change at any point? If you know the answers to these, you won't panic becuase something sneaks up on you... Just my opinions...