<p>I'm with Scoobs. The womens and mens standard have been out of line for awhile, should have been fixed years ago (kind of like when elite women were going low 2:20s while mens record sits at 2:05.......I'm tossing out Paula's insane sub2:20 ability). the 30 minute difference between men vs women was to get more women in the race. This is no longer a problem. Lower women's time 10 minutes..like Yo Sake suggested. </p>
<p> </p>
<p> I don't like the idea of letting this years people in next years (unless they raced after the Sept date), it'll just make next year worse. tighten womens standard NOW...grandfather the times until end of year. I don't like the lottery idea........however, if you can say that you've actually qualified for NYC marathon, it has major bragging rights....however..........most people don't know that it's much harder to qualify for NY than Boston. </p>
<p> </p>
<p> I don't like the idea of letting this years people in next years (unless they raced after the Sept date), it'll just make next year worse. tighten womens standard NOW...grandfather the times until end of year. I don't like the lottery idea........however, if you can say that you've actually qualified for NYC marathon, it has major bragging rights....however..........most people don't know that it's much harder to qualify for NY than Boston. </p>