Runners Forum - Kick Runners banner

Race Qualification Methods

817 Views 16 Replies 11 Participants Last post by  Alaska Mike
<p>The 2011 Boston Marathon sold out in about 8 hours this year.  Last year, it was right around Thanksgiving.  The year before, it was some time in February.  Prior to that, you could sign up a few weeks before the race in April.  So unless something changes it is highly likely that it will sell out in less than an hour next year.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I started at 9 am ET (which was 5 am Alaska time) and couldn't get signed up for an hour and 15 min this year.  There has been some speculation about the various methods that BAA might use to limit the field size and make it less of a internet-rush to sign up.  Various methods they could utilize include:</p>
<p> </p>
<p>- making the entry qualification standards tougher (i.e. lowering the time requirements for various age groups).</p>
<p>- instituting a lottery system similar to the one used for New York City marathon.</p>
<p>- making certain races qualifiers and having a certain number of slots per race (similar to IM Hawaii)</p>
<p>- increasing the cost</p>
<p>- allowing current year racers to sign up for next year's race before everyone else</p>
<p>- leave it as it is</p>
<p> </p>
<p>What do folks here think?  Any systems you would prefer they implement?</p>
<p> </p>
1 - 2 of 17 Posts
<p>There is buzz about that the qualifying standards are easier for women than for their male same-age counterparts.  I think that's a good place to start.  I also like the 1 year eligibility rather than 2.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I dont' know that I like a lottery system.  I think I would feel ripped off if I did all I could in my training and racing to get in, and then missed out on pure luck. </p>
<p><a href="" target="_blank"></a></p>
1 - 2 of 17 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.